- The Left-Hand Column
- Posts
- Et tu, Brute? You’re also getting coaching?
Et tu, Brute? You’re also getting coaching?
What if Brutus had gotten curious before he got a dagger?
In This Left-Hand Column:
“I can’t believe we’re arguing about this AGAIN. It’s so obvious that we need to prioritize fixing the complaints from our largest customer immediately, but he’s obsessed with polishing the AI features. Is he just trying to aggravate me, or is he actually this shortsighted?”
– Internal monologue of a co-founder in conflict with their CEO
This month, we're sitting with a problem that shows up in almost every leadership partnership at some point: the irreconcilable conflict. The one where the other person simply won't see what's plainly obvious, where you've begun to wonder whether the relationship itself is the problem.
We're going to explore it through a story you already know—with one small alteration. What if, in the weeks before the Ides of March, 44 BC, Brutus got some leadership coaching?
Quick note for those whose ancient Roman History/high school Shakespeare is a little rusty:
The Ides of March refers to March 15th; the day Julius Caesar was betrayed and killed by a group of senators, including his close friend, Brutus. The soothsayer's warning, "Beware the Ides of March," is one of Shakespeare's most famous lines, spoken to Caesar before his assassination.
ACT I: The Case For Curiosity
Brutus, let's start with what's keeping you up.
Jess, it’s Caesar again. He won't listen! He's stopped hearing anyone but himself. He's going to destroy everything we've built. He’s leaving me no choice.
I hear you. The mentor you love has become someone you no longer recognize, and no amount of Stoic rigor has moved him an inch. That's an exhausting place to be.
Nods tiredly
I’ve coached a lot of leaders, and one thing I’ve learned? Intractable conflict is a cue to back up and reflect.
The story running through your head during a sustained conflict has been shaped, consciously or not, to make sense of your own experience. It's coherent and consistent, and it stops right at your own edge. It doesn't say much about what's happening across the table.
So humor me. Look at this the way a scientist would, with genuine curiosity about the data you haven't collected yet.
Starting with you: What are you optimizing for?
I’m fighting for Rome, for the Republic.
Why? Why does it matter so much to you?
Because… It’s right. It’s just. It’s about integrity, protecting the rule of law that separates civilization from… chaos.
My ancestral namesake gave his life to birth the Republic. I won’t stand by as it’s torn asunder.
Good. Now, what about Caesar? From where you’re standing, he’s corrupt, deluded, and dangerous. But what’s beneath that? What is he optimizing for? What story is he telling himself?
He’s a tyrant! He’s optimizing for power.
But why? If you stop seeing him as a tyrant for a moment, what is the most generous interpretation you can make of his behavior?"
What would change about your approach if you made just a little room for curiosity?
Breaking The Fourth Wall: The Cost Of Blind Conviction
Now back to you, you, dear LHC reader.
Imagine Brutus takes that last question seriously. Instead of meeting in the shadows with Cassius and the conspirators, he requests a private dinner with Caesar. No agenda except inquiry. He asks, and then he actually listens.
What he might find is not a monster but a tired, aging statesman terrified of the chaos that will follow his own death; a man who had broken institutional norms because he had concluded (perhaps wrongly) that the institution could no longer save itself.
Imagine Brutus, having listened, says something like: "Maybe what you're really optimizing for, Caesar, is not to be forgotten. Maybe what I'm really optimizing for is not to fall short of my ancestor. What if there's a path where we can both save the Rome we love? What if you're remembered as the Restorer, not the Destroyer, and the Republic survives because of you rather than despite you?"
We can't know what Caesar would have said. But we know what happened when Brutus didn't ask.
The irreconcilable conflict is rarely as irreconcilable as it feels. But you'll never know what was actually possible if you arrive already certain. One of the most impactful leadership skills is knowing when you don't yet have the full picture.
ACT II: From Opposite Ends of The Table
If we turn down the temperature in leadership conflicts, it’s easier to see what it boils down to: Different people who have stopped being curious about what the other is seeing. When these unspoken perspectives collide, every conversation becomes a negotiation in which both sides speak different languages and call the other’s lack of fluency a character flaw.
Simply recognizing the difference in perspective—without judgment, without immediately trying to correct it—can create a breakthrough. The goal isn’t to be persuaded; you don’t have to learn to speak the other person’s language. The goal is to find connection, enough common ground to work from.
For instance, Brutus and Caesar both wanted what was best for Rome. They diverged somewhere beneath that; on what "best" meant, on what had to be protected, on who got to decide. But they shared the top of the pyramid.
All well and good in theory… But Jess, what does this actually sound like when you're in it?
"I think we actually want the same outcome here, we're just seeing different paths to it. Can we start there? What does a win look like to you?"
You're not conceding your position, you're locating the floor you're both standing on before you argue about the ceiling.
"I feel like we keep having the same conversation without getting anywhere. Can we pause the 'what' for a second and talk about the 'why'? I'm optimizing for [X]. What are you optimizing for right now?"
This works because it names the loop without assigning blame, and it models the vulnerability it's asking for. You go first.
"I want to understand your perspective better, because I don't think I do yet. Not to debate it; just to actually get it. Can you help me see what you're most worried about losing here?"
The "not to debate it" line lowers the other person's defenses by making clear you're not loading up a counterargument; you intend to sit with the answer.
These approaches don’t require the other person to change; they require you to get curious first. Starting with what's genuinely shared moves a conflict from we are fundamentally incompatible to we disagree on this specific thing, for identifiable reasons. That's workable. That's a conversation, not a verdict.
FINAL ACT: Et Tu, Brute?
Some conflicts are genuinely intractable, and yes, sometimes the only path forward is a hard, irreversible decision. But exceptional leadership means arriving at that decision from awareness and intentionality, not from obstinacy or calcified conviction.
So, before your version of the Ides of March, sit with these questions:
Am I thinking clearly? Conflict has a way of making our most reactive thinking feel like our most lucid. If you're still in the emotional grip of the last difficult exchange, the most useful thing you can do is wait. Create enough distance to distinguish between what you know and what you're feeling.
Do I actually have the full picture? Your story, yes — but theirs? If you can't articulate what your co-leader is optimizing for in terms they'd recognize as fair, you're missing something. And when you don't have direct access to their story, reach for the most generous interpretation available to you. Not to excuse them, but to understand their perspective well enough to identify where progress might actually be possible.
Have I accepted who I'm dealing with? And can I live with that acceptance? Sometimes the only shift necessary is to release the expectation that the other person will start making sense to you. Accepting someone as they are, rather than as you need them to be, creates the kind of groundedness that keeps you from saying or doing something you'll regret.
Am I including myself in the resolution/solution? Most people arrive at hard conversations hoping the other person will finally come around. As the therapist Lori Gottlieb observes, people walk into her office all the time with a very clear sense of their problem, and the solution they have in mind always involves someone else changing. It's a deeply human instinct. But it puts the resolution outside your control, which is not a useful place to operate from. What is in your control is your approach, your curiosity, your willingness to find the shared ground and build from there.
Is it worth the cost? Have I already tried a handful of times and seen that it's not changing? If I keep harping on this, if I pursue this course of action, is the potential outcome worth the effort?
Curtain Call
This is a lesson I personally wrestle with, because I can fall into what I think of as the engineer's trap — the quiet conviction that there's one correct way to see a situation, and that the work is simply to get everyone else to see it too.
What helps me is remembering to take the right/wrong and better/worse judgments out of it. Different perspectives aren't errors to be corrected. They're data. And the leaders who navigate complexity most effectively are those who've learned to treat it that way.
Choosing curiosity over conviction doesn't mean abandoning your principles. It means having the courage to test them against reality before you act on them.
Brutus was so committed to being the Perfect Republican that he never stopped to ask whether his actions would actually help the Roman people he was trying to protect. His certainty cost him everything — his friend, his cause, and eventually his life.
The question worth carrying into this month (and beyond) isn't “Am I right?” It's “What am I missing?”
Often, that question takes more courage than a dagger ever did.
Beware the Ides of March.
Keep reading, keep leading,
Jess
P.S. If The Left-Hand Column has resonated with you, consider supporting my work by clicking on one of the ads below. It's a small action that has a big impact!
Thank you for subscribing!
For more, follow me on LinkedIn
Turn AI into Your Income Engine
Ready to transform artificial intelligence from a buzzword into your personal revenue generator
HubSpot’s groundbreaking guide "200+ AI-Powered Income Ideas" is your gateway to financial innovation in the digital age.
Inside you'll discover:
A curated collection of 200+ profitable opportunities spanning content creation, e-commerce, gaming, and emerging digital markets—each vetted for real-world potential
Step-by-step implementation guides designed for beginners, making AI accessible regardless of your technical background
Cutting-edge strategies aligned with current market trends, ensuring your ventures stay ahead of the curve
Download your guide today and unlock a future where artificial intelligence powers your success. Your next income stream is waiting.
You Deserve a Better Intranet
A modern intranet like Haystack streamlines workplace operations by centralizing knowledge, communication, and resources.
Employees will no longer waste time hunting through email chains or scattered folders—they can find what they need in seconds.
With customizable templates, clear layouts, and multimedia capabilities, teams can create and share content that is easy to read, navigate, and reference. Haystack turns your intranet into an interactive, engaging resource hub that supports collaboration and knowledge retention.
Upgrading your intranet boosts efficiency across departments, reduces duplicated work, and ensures consistent, accurate information is accessible to everyone. Employees stay informed, aligned, and empowered, while leadership gains visibility into engagement and usage.
Haystack transforms your intranet from a static repository into a dynamic platform that drives productivity, connection, and culture.
The Headlines Traders Need Before the Bell
Tired of missing the trades that actually move?
In under five minutes, Elite Trade Club delivers the top stories, market-moving headlines, and stocks to watch — before the open.
Join 200K+ traders who start with a plan, not a scroll.



